Real Synthesis vs. Fake Synthesis
Synthesis weaves multiple sources together on the basis of ideas that those sources contribute. The ideas matter most, not a list of who said what.
Maybe the best way to understand synthesis is to contrast it with various forms of fake synthesis that sometimes appear in writing.
The paragraphs below have placeholder text. Ignore the machine-generated Latin. But pay attention to the colored text that shows setup and the use of sources. The example is based on print sources with page numbers, but the ideas apply to any written source.
Fake Synthesis Type 1
A monologue expressed in a single-source paragraph with that source related only to itself. Don’t do this.
That is just a monologue featuring Smith. Do not write this kind of paragraph.
Fake Synthesis Type 2
Paragraphs that use multiple sources, but one source is the “star” in those paragraphs and the rest are thrown in just a bit, simply to have additional sources rather than develop a conversation. Don’t do this.
That is just Smith hogging the mic and Jones, Brown, and Martinez popping up to say one thing each. Do not write this kind of paragraph.
Fake Synthesis Type 3
Serial reportage: paragraphs report ideas from sources, one after the other, but do not show how the sources are in a conversation relevant to the reason the student is using the sources.
This is the most common type of fake synthesis. Don’t do this.
That is just a report of what the sources have to say, one by one, but it does not weave them together. Do not write this kind of paragraph.
Last updated